Current:Home > NewsJudge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation -AssetPath
Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
View
Date:2025-04-12 05:53:01
A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration policy that aimed to ease a path to citizenship for some undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.
The program, lauded as one of the biggest presidential actions to help immigrant families in years, allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to apply for a green card without first having to leave the country.
The temporary relief from deportation brought a brief sense of security to some 500,000 immigrants estimated to benefit from the program before Texas-based U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker put it on hold in August, days after applicants filed their paperwork.
Barker ruled Thursday that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by implementing the program and had stretched the legal interpretation of relevant immigration law “past its breaking point.”
The short-lived Biden administration initiative known as “Keeping Families Together” would have been unlikely to remain in place after Donald Trump took office in January. But its early termination creates greater uncertainty for immigrant families as many are bracing for Trump’s return to the White House.
Trump’s election victory this week sets the stage for a swift crackdown on undocumented individuals after the Republican ran on promises of “mass deportation.” The president-elect energized his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany anti-immigrant statements, including that immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the nation.
During his first term, Trump appointed Barker as a judge in Tyler, Texas, which lies in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a favored venue for advocates pushing conservative arguments.
Barker had placed the immigration initiative on hold after Texas and 15 other states, led by their Republican attorneys general, filed a legal challenge accusing the executive branch of bypassing Congress to help immigrant families for “blatant political purposes.”
Republicans argued the initiative created costs for their states and could draw more migrants to the U.S.
The policy would have applied to people who have been living continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, do not pose a security threat and have utilized the existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that offers deportation protections.
Those married to a citizen by June 17, the day before the program was announced, could pay a $580 application fee and fill out a lengthy application explaining why they deserve humanitarian parole. If approved, applicants would have three years to seek permanent residency and obtain work authorization.
It was not immediately clear Thursday whether anyone had received approval under the program, which only accepted applications for about a week before the federal judge placed it on hold.
Noncitizen spouses are already eligible for legal status but often have to apply from their home countries. The process typically includes a years-long wait outside of the U.S., which can separate family members with different immigration statuses.
veryGood! (29)
Related
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Carolina Panthers owner David Tepper appears to throw drink at Jacksonville Jaguars fans
- 'We'll leave the light on for you': America's last lighthouse keeper is leaving her post
- Maurice Hines, tap-dancing icon and 'The Cotton Club' star, dies at 80
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Kirk Cousins leads 'Skol' chant before Minnesota Vikings' game vs. Green Bay Packers
- Japan issues tsunami warnings after aseries of very strong earthquakes in the Sea of Japan
- Pistons beat Raptors 129-127 to end NBA record-tying losing streak at 28 games
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Most funding for endangered species only benefits a few creatures. Thousands of others are left in limbo
Ranking
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Lithium-ion battery fire in a cargo ship’s hold is out after several days of burning
- LeBron James fumes over officials' ruling on apparent game-tying 3-pointer
- More Rohingya refugees arrive in Indonesia despite rejection from locals
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Actor Tom Wilkinson, known for 'The Full Monty,' dies at 75
- Resolved: To keep making New Year's resolutions
- States set to enact new laws in 2024 on guns, fuzzy dice and taxes
Recommendation
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
Knicks getting OG Anunoby in trade with Raptors for RJ Barrett, Immanuel Quickley
Inside some of the most unique collections at the Library of Congress as it celebrates 224th anniversary
UFOs, commercial spaceflight and rogue tomatoes: Recapping 2023's wild year in space
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
PGA Tour updates players on negotiations with investors, Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund as deadline extends into 2024
Shakira honored with 21-foot bronze statue in her hometown in Colombia
Lithium-ion battery fire in a cargo ship’s hold is out after several days of burning